I stated in my first post of this current exchange that both (VP selections had not been made at that time) candidates had made errors in judgement, and that evaluating those judgments by both men was a fair and reasonable way to make a decision on who to vote for.
This was a totally non partisan statement
It is not only reasonable but almost mandatory to consider associations made freely with the likes of Ayers, Wright, Resko and Frank Marshall Davis when considering a candidate with no legislative accomplishments to evaluate?
When you tag your comments with a line like this:
But hey I understand and its my mistake I forgot about IOKIYAR.
How unbiased should anyone consider your opinions to be?
Perhaps you could try IADKAD!
Have I ever said peopel should not take into consideration any past decisons about Obama? Have I ever said ignore anything in Obama's past? Why should I since I did. I weighed his mistake against McCain and I choose Obama.
You act like I think Obama is perfect. You act like I said he never made mistakes.
McCain's blunders and continous poor judgements in the past and now is all thee reason I need.
I cannot trust a man who sided with this adminstrations tragic policies over 90% of the time for the last 8 years to now give the country the chnage that is needed.
I heard the same arguments 4 years ago from the same people when they told us "stay the course" we know what we are doing.
Now they telling us "We will give you change" we know what we are doing. No thank you. If Obama wins and shows the same sort of incompetnce we got from the Bush Administration has shown. Then we can give him a new congress in 2 years.
But no, I will not gamble with a 10% chance.