Portofino Resort- Now with a new BEACH BAR!!
Topic Options
#330490 - 03/28/09 04:32 PM Government loses constitutional amendment appeal
Short Offline
March 27, 2009

The justices of the Court of Appeal have affirmed the decision of the learned Chief Justice that a referendum should be held regarding the package of constitutional changes being proposed by the Barrow Administration. The ruling means that the Sixth Amendment Bill which has gone through all its stages, and is only awaiting ascent from the Governor General, is now in limbo. It was a citizens group comprised of Alberto Vellos, Darrel Carter, Dorla Dawson and Yasmine Shoman who had challenged the proposal; maintaining that the PM had acted unlawfully in failing to call a referendum before introducing the bill to the House of Representatives. The group was represented by Attorneys Lisa Shoman, Anthony Sylvestre and Kevin Authors. Following today’s decision we spoke to Shoman and Sylvester who about the outcome of the case.

Lisa Shoman; Attorney
“We are very pleased but also we knew that we would get confirmation of the Chief Justices Decision. Our arguments were not only compelling but the Chief Justice’s decision itself was very sound and solidly reason. So we felt that she would have been upheld and in fact what is now going to occur is that the Prime Minister will have to put the proposed amendment affected to the electorate in order for them to affirm whether this is what they want. Unless, of course, he chooses to withdraw those amendments.”

Janelle Chanona Reporting
The idea here however, though, is that the Referendum Act has been altered permanently so how would you say that this ruling affects future constitutional changes?

Lisa Shoman; Attorney
"I understand that it wouldn’t and I think that there is room now for the citizens of Belize to demand that those changes which were made be put back into the referendum act so that their fundamental rights and freedoms can be safeguarded. Particularly in a view where we are talking about intercepting communication because as you know the right to privacy is a fundamental right and freedom. So it is a very serious point.”

Janelle Chanona Reporting
I know that there had been other cases that had been mandated from the group of constitutional changes; the land owners case. How does this decision this decision affect those?

Anthony Sylvestre, Attorney
“As you are aware the Chief Justice has prepared that. The proposed amendments that dealt with the vesting of the rights, petroleum rights, exclusive in the government without allowing a citizen of Belize or a land owner to actually go to the court to make a determination as to whether he or she has any interest in those minerals or petroleum. That was declared to have been unconstitutional. That matter, the government has said that it would appeal, I am not sure if they have already appealed it or not. This referendum case dealt with both that proposed amendment to the vesting of the petroleum exclusive to government and it also dealt with the preventative detention which was later pulled form the constitutional amendment bill. So what we have happening with in a sense telling the government that on one hand that whole amendment is unconstitutional and this judgment today is telling the government in any event you ought to have submitted to the citizens in the form of a referendum. So that is the interrelation between both. You perhaps would have to ask the counsel for the government what government proposes to do with those two judgments; but certainly what those two judgments emphasize is that as it relates to if a government or a parliament wishes to make serious derogation from citizens constitutional rights that has to be done within the powers of the law.”

The Governments has also been ordered to pay the cost of the citizens group. The Government Representative, Senior Counsel Lois Young told Love News that the Government will read the reasons for the Court of Appeal’s decision before it can say what its plans are.

Live and let live

#330890 - 03/31/09 05:28 PM Re: Government loses constitutional amendment appeal [Re: Short]
Short Offline
P. M. loses in Court of Appeal: There must be a referendum

“The Prime Minister ought to have submitted to the electorate for their approval the proposed amendments contained in the Sixth Constitutional Amendment Bill which are intended to amend the fundamental rights and freedoms under the Constitution before the bill is introduced into Parliament. Nonetheless, not having done so, the Bill must now be submitted to the electorate....it is not the ideal situation but under the Referendum Act the electorate is entitled to be afforded the opportunity to state whether they approve the proposed amendments.” Those are the words of President of the Court of Appeal Elliot Mottley, contained in his decision of civil appeal no. 17 of 2008.

Readers will recall that at the first sitting of the House of Representatives following the UDP’s victory at the polls, the new Barrow administration introduced the Sixth Constitutional Amendment Bill, a package of changes to the Constitution which proposed, among other things, to empower the Belize Police Department to “preventatively detain” suspects, make reforms to the Senate and vest petroleum and mineral rights in the Government of Belize.

Simultaneously, the Government moved to amend the Referendum Act, to remove the portion of the law that mandated that a “referendum shall be held on any amendment to Chapter II of the Constitution which derogates from the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed.”

The Barrow administration subsequently removed the “preventative detention” clause amid public outcry and distaste. A citizens’ group, comprised of Alberto Vellos, Darrell Carter, Dorla Dawson and Yasin Shoman and represented by attorneys Lisa Shoman, Anthony Sylvestre and Kevin Arthurs, challenged the entire Sixth Amendment Bill, asserting that the Prime Minister had acted unlawfully in failing to call a referendum.

The case landed before the Chief Justice, Dr. Abdulai Conteh. Through its attorney, Senior Counsel Lois Young, the Government argued that the bill, which by then had been taken through all its stages, did meet all the requirements for changing the Constitution, namely the three-fourths majority in the House of Representatives, Senate approval and compliance with the 90-day waiting period. But in the end, Conteh sided with the citizens’ group finding that, “in introducing the two bills on the same day, there was a clear attempt to remove from consideration or deny an opportunity to the electorate of Belize to have a say on the proposed changes to section 5 and 17 of the Constitution. This I find unavailing because the relevant law provides for a referendum to be held on any relevant amendment.”

While he opted not to order the Government to hold a referendum, the CJ declared that he expected that a referendum would be held because the Referendum Act was still in effect when the Bill was introduced.

The Government immediately appealed the decision. That case was argued before President of the Court of Appeal Elliot Mottley and Justices Manuel Sosa and Boyd Carey in October 2008.

Again, Shoman, Sylvestre and Arthurs contended that the electorate did have a legitimate expectation to have their say on the changes. That was a position rebutted wholly by Senior Counsel Lois Young, who maintained that the Referendum Act had been repealed and therefore not applicable.

But in their decision handed today, the Justices upheld the CJ’s decision and agreed that the proposed amendments to the Constitution of Belize must be submitted to the electorate for its approval. Following the decision, attorneys Lisa Shoman and Anthony Sylvestre were clearly overjoyed. “We were very comfortable that it would be. We thought that not only the arguments we made were powerful arguments but in fact that the CJ’s decision was very well reasoned. The President of the Court has indicated that he has a slightly different view of the timing of when the referendum case should have been brought and when that legislation should have been challenged, which of course we will look very carefully at. But the point is here is that the Chief Justice’s decision has been affirmed and as far as we are concerned, this is a great victory for the people of Belize, for the citizens of Belize.”

What happens now appears to be uncertain. According to Young, her clients - the Attorney General and the Prime Minister, will have to read the decision before deciding what will be done. Shoman already has her own anticipations. “Well, we will expect that in terms of the sections that were affected, having to do specifically with land rights, which would be one, and having to do with any other fundamental right and freedom which was affected by the Sixth Constitutional Amendment Bill, that those would have to be looked at again and decisions will need to be made as to whether the government will withdraw those sections or whether it will put it to a referendum for the citizens of Belize to decide whether they wish those changes to be made.”

Mxed in with the victorious and celebratory atmosphere, however, is the reality that the Referendum Act that has got things to this point has been repealed in the House, meaning that any further proposals to the Constitution need not be submitted to the electorate. That fact was not lost on Shoman, “Clearly, what the citizens of Belize should be thinking about is finding a way to insist that the Government put back that safeguard into the legislation of Belize, i.e., safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms with a referendum. We need it.”

There is also the matter of the case of the Landowners Association and Barry Bowen against the clause of the Bill which deals with land and mineral rights. The Chief Justice has already ruled that the clause would be unconstitutional because it removes the right of access to the courts for compensation within a reasonable time. The Government has already appealed that decision to the Court of Appeal. Today’s ruling could negate that appeal if the matter is put to the electorate and subsequently rejected by voters.

The Prime Minister is currently out of the country, but speaking on the Chief Justice’s ruling that a referendum should be held, on August 22nd at the House of Representatives, PM Barrow maintained that, “We disagree with the Chief Justice that there is any need to hold what we consider to be an idle referendum, but out of deference to his position as the head of the courts, we will not bring the amendments into force until this matter has been sorted out by the Court of Appeal. If the Court of Appeal says it agrees with the Chief Justice and we must hold a referendum, notwithstanding that it will make no difference to the law, we will do so because we are obliged to respect the courts of this country.” (News Five transcript)(News Five transcript)

As we noted earlier, the Sixth Amendment Bill has been taken through all its stages and is only awaiting assent from the Governor General to become law.

Live and let live


Click for excellent scuba lessons with Elbert Greer!

Things to do

Daily News
Daily Weather

Classified Ads
San Pedro Sun
Ambergris Today
SP Town Council
Channel 7
Channel 5
Love FM
The Reporter
Caye Caulker

TV Newscasts
Radio Stations

Click for our
Search thousands of Belizean-only websites

Event Guides
Event Calendar
Specials & Events
Things to Do
iTravel Belize
Paradise Theater

San Pedro Scoop!
Tia Chocolate
My Beautiful Belize
I-Travel Belize
Belize Adventure
Belize Hub
Romantic Travel
Bound for Belize
Conch Creative
As The Coconuts Drop
More Blogs...
Search thousands of Belizean-only websites
Chaa Creek is an award-winning luxury Belize Resort, rated as one of the worlds best Eco Lodges. We are a pioneer in adventure travel to Belize since 1981!
White Sands Dive Shop - 5 Star PADI Dive Facility - Daily diving, SCUBA instruction and Snorkeling
Caribbean Inspired All Natural Condiments & Spice Blends, Over 100 are Gluten Free!
We manage a variety of homes, apartments, condos and commercial properties here on Ambergris Caye. Our minimum lease on ALL properties is six months.
Conch Shell Inn: All rooms are right on the beach in the heart of San Pedro, so within walking distance to anything and everything!!
Lil’ Alphonse has snorkel equipment to fit anyone as well as Marine Park Tickets and flotation devices to assist those not as experienced.
Coastal Xpress offers a daily scheduled ferry run to most resorts, restaurants and private piers on the island of Anbergris Caye. We also offer  private and charter water taxi service.
Mini Chat

Cayo Espanto
Click for Cayo Espanto, and have your own private island
More Links
Click for exciting and adventurous tours of Belize with Katie Valk!
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Who's Online
0 registered (), 25 Guests and 7 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
18,633 Registered Members
44 Forums
63,706 Topics
461,226 Posts

Most users ever online: 1,262 @ 06/10/07 02:16 PM

AmbergrisCaye.com CayeCaulker.org HELP! Visitor Center Goods & Services San Pedro Town
BelizeSearch.com Message Board Lodging Diving Fishing Things to Do History
BelizeNews.com Maps Phonebook Belize Business Directory
BelizeCards.com SanPedroDaily.com Picture of the Day

The opinions and views expressed on this board are the subjective opinions of Ambergris Caye Message Board members
and not of the Ambergris Caye Message Board its affiliates, or its employees.