I agree with Simon and papashine and since we are living (or have lived) with the system I think our opinion has some weight. My Mom had a brain hemorrage was flown from the hospital in her tone to a regional neural centre and had surgery the same day. She spent 4 weeks in ICU then 2 weeks in SCU. She walked out of the hospital with no permanent damage. My wife was diagnosed and cured of her cancer, all my sisters had their babies in a delivery room with attending doctor, my sister-in-law's type 1 diabetes was managed for over 20 years and my Dad, now suffering from alzheimers, is in a nursing home. None of us had to mortgage our homes to get care needed. I'm wondering why the patient in the article is not getting the surgery she had in the states paid for? I understood that in critical cases if the care can't be given in Canada the patient can receive the care anywhere and the plan will cover the cost. My co-worker did exactly that a few years back and received surgery in Detroit and had it paid for.
No one is proposing that the US adopt the Canadian style of healthcare nor is anyone saying that it is perfect (we have abuse, fraud, budget constraints) but I think it's better than being gouged by insurance companies, hospitals, doctors etc. or not having any coverage at all.