Portofino Resort- Now with a new BEACH BAR!!
Topic Options
#414054 - 08/17/11 01:58 PM CCJ Puts Brakes On BTL Sale
Marty Offline
BTL is not for sale - not right now at least, as the Caribbean Court Of Justice has ordered the Government not to sell any more shares in the phone company until the matter of the July, 2011 re-acquisition is settled before the courts. That's what came out of a special session of the Caribbean Court of Justice - which held a sitting via teleconference between Belize and the court's headquarters in Trinidad.

As we've reported, two weeks ago, the Ashcroft Alliance filed an unusual application in the Caribbean Court of Justice- leapfrogging the Belizean courts and asking the final court of appeal for urgent, interim relief, stopping Government from proceeding with the 9th Amendment to the constitution and a Declaration that the re- acquisition of Telemedia by the Government is void.

The matter was heard today between Belize City and Port of Spain - with a large double flat screen TV and web-cam carted into one of the Supreme Court's courtrooms for the teleconference.

The panel of CCJ Judges was led by Justice Rolston Nelson, with Justices David Hayton and Desiree Bernard. Godfrey Smith and Eamon Courtenay represented the Ashcroft Alliance and Solictor General Cheryl Krusen and Lois Young represented the government. Arguments were vigorous and far - reaching with the court liberally dispensing opinions on a range of related matters. First, they agreed that, quote: "It is a commercial matter which requires urgent attention and will be treated as vacation business" meaning a matter to be heard when the court is usually on leave.

As regards jurisdiction and the Ashcroft alliance bypassing the local courts, the panel of judges held the position that it is, quote, "a situation which permits the court in its inherent jurisdiction to hear a matter which the court of appeal has not heard….in the interest of justice."

From there the panel proceeded to hear the matter but the court strictly avoided making any determination on the proposed ninth amendment saying that the constitutionality of that bill can be challenged through the courts after it is passed.

Justice Hayton, the only British member of the panel, freely opined that that the constitution could be amended even to re-introduce slavery, but "it would not be held to be valid and constitutional." And from there he asked a loaded, though rhetorical question: "Do we need an injunction if it will be void anyway?"

He was speaking broadly about a hypothetically absurd amendment - like the slavery one - but the point was held that no injunction is needed specifically against the ninth amendment because it will be open to judicial challenge.

The clearest position from the panel of judges was that, quote "If the amendment does come into effect, it is open to go to the courts which can declare it null and void," end quote. From there the court agreed that day to day management of Telemedia has to be left with government-appointed 2011 board. But, they stressed that - as much as possible - the status quo as regards the company's share-holdings must be preserved to protect the position of the Ashcroft alliance - if it is vindicated in later hearings.

Both sides tried to hammer out a mutually suitable undertaking to preserve that position in the lunch time adjournment but they could not agree - and so the court had to make an order. It says "that the board (is) permitted to carry on the day to day management…of Telemedia…provided that (Government is) restrained…from taking any steps to sell" any more shares in the company. 30% has already been sold to the Social Security Board and the Central Bank.

The court also made what it called a pro forma declaration enforcing the June 24th. ruling by the Court of Appeals. As you will recall, government said that was a declaratory order and it needed an enforcement order before the Ashcroft Alliance could resume control of BTL. Well, today the CCJ said that quote, "one does not make coercive orders against the state or the crown." Like we said it was a loaded special session of the court, and after we spoke to both sides about what happened in court:

Godfrey Smith, Attorney for Employees' Trust
"We asked for three things - special leave to appeal this matter to the CCJ. That was granted. We asked for an injunction restraining any sale or disposal of the shares that was granted. We also had in the application an injunction to stop the passage of the 9th Amendment Bill. You will recall however that though the court did not grant it - one of the Justices in particular, Mr. Justice Hayden said words to the effect that it doesn't matter whether you get that injunction or not because if the act is unconstitutional - you can come to the court and challenge it and he gave an example that if parliament, for instance, attempted to make legal slavery - obviously that is not something that could stand - and so it was our view that he was making the point that even though the government was attempting to bar the court from inquiring into the constitutionality and validity of the acquisition, that as he saw it, the court would still be able to do that."

Jules Vasquez
"Essentially you all are restrained from selling shares. BTL is no longer for sale at this time."

Lois Young, attorney for Government
"Well you know what you have to remember that the constitution says 51% remains in the government, so it's a very small amount of shares that can't be sold."

Jules Vasquez
"The constitution does not yet say that."

Lois Young, attorney for Government
"It will say that and the amendment to the constitution says that. 30% of the shares have already been sold. So the percentage that's left between what was taken and the 51% minus the 30% is not a lot of shares."

Jules Vasquez
"But in passing - one of the members of the panel, one of the judges pointed out that that constitutional amendment may be up-ended. It may be up-ended."

Lois Young, attorney for Government
"The panel did not say that."

Jules Vasquez
"He was making his comparison. He said that it could be, and that it's not impossible or unthinkable."

Lois Young, attorney for Government
"Actually what the court has done is to verify what the Prime Minister has been saying from the start that you can challenge constitutional amendments. That's what the court has said, the CCJ has said that and so all the naysayers who say no we can't, that is not true - you can challenge it."

Jules Vasquez
"May be challenged."

Lois Young, attorney for Government
"Yes because the CCJ has said so, that's the first thing. The second thing is that they have refused to stop the process of passage of the constitutional amendment. They refused that injunction. They will not interfere with the legislative process. So all in all, it's not a bad result."

Eamon Courtenay, Attorney for BCB
"The basis on which the court granted relief to us was that we satisfied them that they ought to exercise their discretion because they saw that there was a arguable case and that relief from the court of the Caribbean was necessary to protect the interests of the parties."

"Indeed as you saw this afternoon the court of its own motion decided that it was going to restrain the sale of shares of Belize Telemedia. Indeed the objections by my learned friends for the government - and it was two of them going one after the other whilst we sat quietly hearing them parry with the judges of the Caribbean Court of Justice - The Caribbean Court of Justice found that the sale of these sales should stop. It is signaling once again that perhaps the court believes that the way in which this is being done is unconstitutional, null and void. Very simply, you cannot in a democracy behave like a dictator and expect that respectful courts are going to a probate what you do - that is the message from the CCJ to the government of Belize and I am predicting that it is going to be message from the Supreme Court of Belize when we challenge the 2011 act and the 9th amendment."

Jules Vasquez
"How consequential is it that the judges have said that in fact the governments' action on June 24th - it did not need a coercive order because a government does not need to be coercive to obey its own laws?"

Lois Young, attorney for Government
"Well what Mr. Smith was seeking wasn't a coercive order. What Mr. Smith was seeking was for Dean Boyce who is not the majority shareholder of BTL to be given permission to go back in. He (Dean Boyce) had no locus standi to walk into BTL on the evening of the 24th of June. He is an owner of one share in Sunshine, he claims to represent the trustees that own 22% of other trust that supposed to own 22%, so what right did he have to walk in?"

Jules Vasquez
"Well I think that the head of the panel also says that behavior was not the best."

Lois Young, attorney for Government
"Remember what he said (the Judge) that that behavior of Dean Boyce was not the best."

Jules Vasquez
"But he also frowned upon that - two judges from the panel - the fact that the government demanded a coercive order when none is needed against a government."

Lois Young, attorney for Government
"No, he didn't say that none is needed. He said coercive orders are not usually required. But you have to remember that the previous owners of BTL required a coercive order against Mr. Prosser - when Mr. Prosser won his cases in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal. The same Dean Boyce who found it proper to walk into BTL on the evening sought a coercive and even when Judge Conteh gave the coercive order they did not allow Prosser in."

Courtenay and Smith have given the CCJ an undertaking to file an action challenging the re-acquisition of 2011 and the ninth Amendment to the constitution in the Belize Supreme Court by September fifth.

In the meantime, until that winds its way through the courts, Government is barred from selling any more shares in Telemedia. That injunction throws a serious wrench in the works for GOB because they have been in negotiation with an Argentinean Company to buy a substantial chunk of the company's shares.

Channel 7


Top
#414055 - 08/17/11 02:00 PM Re: CCJ Puts Brakes On BTL Sale [Re: Marty]
Marty Offline

Caribbean Court of Justice stops government from selling B.T.L. shares

The litigation war over Telemedia continued by videoconference before the CCJ, today. Despite the objections of the attorneys for the government, Lois Young SC and Solicitor General Cheryl Krusen, the CCJ decided that the application was serious enough to be dealt with during the court’s legal vacation. After listening to attorneys Godfrey Smith SC and Eamon Courtenay SC for Dean Boyce and the British Caribbean Bank, the CCJ found that they had an arguable case and therefore granted special leave to appeal to the CCJ. Then this afternoon, in a dramatic decision, the CCJ restrained the government from selling any shares in Telemedia and ordered that all proceeds of sales from Telemedia shares so far be kept intact in accounts at the Central Bank or the commercial banks. With this injunction in place, the government cannot attempt to sell shares to anyone until the true ownership of Telemedia is decided.

Jose Sanchez, Reporting

A special Sitting of the Caribbean Court of Justice was heard today via teleconferencing. While watching from a television screen in Trinidad, Justices Desiree Bernard, Justice Rolston Nelson, and Justice David Hayton heard the cases of British Caribbean Bank and Dean Boyce against the government regarding the Telemedia nationalizations. It was a measured victory for BCB and Dean Boyce.

Godfrey Smith

Godfrey Smith, Attorney for Dean Boyce

“We asked for three things: special leave to have this appealed this matter to CCJ; that was granted, we asked for an injunction restraining any sale or disposal of the shares; that was granted.”

Telemedia Chairman Net Vasquez was present when despite appeals of Lois Young, the CCJ effectively blocked further sales of BTL shares.

Lois Young

Lois Young

“You have to remember that the constitution says fifty-one percent remains in the government; so it’s a very small amount of shares that can’t be sold.”

Jules Vasquez, 7 News

“The constitution does not yet say that.”

Lois Young

“It will say that and the amendment to the constitution says that. Thirty percent of the shares have already been sold. So the percentage that was left between what was taken and the fifty-one percent minus the thirty percent is not a lot of shares.”

Eamon Courtenay

Proceeds of shares, which were sold during the nationalization, are being held in the Central Bank until all suits are concluded.

Eamon Courtenay, Attorney for British Caribbean Bank

“The first point for Belizeans to take away from what happened today is that the government has been saying repeatedly since we filed this application that the applicants didn’t know what they were doing—that they were leap frogging, they were forum shopping and that there was no merit to this application. Well, three seasoned judges of the highest Court in the Caribbean have found that once again government should stick to politics and leave law to lawyers. The basis on which the court granted relief to us was that we satisfied them that they ought to exercise their discretion because they saw that there was an arguable case and that relief from the Court of the Caribbean was necessary to protect the interest of the parties. Indeed, as you saw this afternoon, the court of its own motion, decided that it was going to restrain the sale of shares of Belize Telemedia. Indeed, the objections by my learned friends for the government—and it was two of them—going one after the other whilst we sat quietly hearing them parry with the judges of the Caribbean Court of Justice. The Caribbean Court of Justice found that the sale of these shares should stop. It is signaling, once again; that perhaps the court believes that the way in which this is being done is unconstitutional; null and void. Very simply, you cannot in a democracy behave like a dictator and expect that respectful courts are going to approbate what you do.”

The way has been paved for BCB and Boyce to file challenges to 2011 Acquisition Act and Order. The notice of appeal to the CCJ must be filed by September Fifth. Reporting for News Five, Jose Sanchez.


Top
#414057 - 08/17/11 02:02 PM Re: CCJ Puts Brakes On BTL Sale [Re: Marty]
Marty Offline
COURT RULES ON SALE OF SHARES IN TELEMEDIA

The Belize Telemedia Limited battle for ownership between the Ashcroft Alliance and the Government of Belize was a heated debate in the Supreme Court today, but after the back and forth arguments from both ends, the court ruled that the sale of shares for BTL should not continue at this time and that BTL is no longer for sale. This decision stemmed from an August 2nd injunction served to the government of Belize with notice of an application filed in the Caribbean Court of Justice by the British Caribbean Bank. The application by Ashcroft's British Caribbean Bank Limited is against the Attorney General of Belize and the Minister of Public Utilities. The application seeks an injunction to stop the Government from passing the Belize Constitution 9th Amendment Bill into law; a Declaration that the re-acquisition of Telemedia by the Government of Belize for the people of Belize is void; and an order returning Telemedia to the Ashcroft Alliance. Outside the court rooms today, the media spoke to the Attorneys for British Caribbean Bank Senior Counsel Eamon Courtney and Godfrey Smith.

Eamon Courtney – Attorney, BCB
“I think the first point for Belizeans to take away from what happened today is that the Government has been saying repeatedly since we filed this application, that the applicants didn’t know what they were doing, that they were leapfrogging, they were forum shopping an d that there was no merit to this application. Well, three seasoned judges of the highest court in the Caribbean that once again the Government should stick to politics and leave law to lawyers. The basis on which the court granted relief to us was that we satisfied them that they ought to exercise their discretion because they saw that there was an arguable case and that relief from the Court of the Caribbean was necessary to protect the interest of the parties. Indeed as you saw this afternoon the court of its own motion decided that it was going to restrain the sale of shares of Belize Telemedia, indeed the objections by my learned friends for the Government and it was two of them going one after the other whilst we sat quietly hearing them parry with the judges of the Caribbean Court of Justice. The Caribbean Court of Justice found that the sale of these shares should stop. It is signaling once again that perhaps the court believes that the way in which this is being done is unconstitutional, null and void.”

Godfrey Smith – Attorney, BCB
“We asked for three things, special leave to appeal this matter to the CCJ, that was granted; we asked for an injunction restraining any sale or disposal of the shares, that was granted; we also had in the application a relief, an injunction to pas the passage of the ninth amendment bill. You will recall however that though the court did not grant it, one of the justices in particular Mr. Justice Hayden said words to the effect that it doesn’t matter if whether you get that injunction or not because if the act is constitutional you can come to the court and challenge it and he gave an example that if parliament for instance attempted to make legal slavery, obviously that’s not something that could stand so in our view it is he was making the point that even though the Government was attempting to bar the court from inquiring into the constitutionality and validity of the acquisition, as he saw it the court would still be able to do that.”

Reporter
However, does not make the point for the other side that in fact no one is ever at any point barred from going to the court?

Godfrey Smith – Attorney, BCB
“I fail to see why if that is the position taken by the government why they sought to rite into the constitution in such clear, ample and absolute terms that the court had an absolute bar against it from inquiring on any grounds whatsoever. What they are hoping for is that they can drag this out sufficiently long so that when such challenges are brought before the Supreme Court that we will not succeed and they can drag this out for a very long time.”

Attorney for the Government Lois Young Barrow says today’s ruling was not a complete loss.

Lois Young Barrow – Attorney, GOB
“What the Court has done is to verify what the Prime Minister has been saying from the start, that you can challenge constitutional amendments, that is what the court has said, the CCJ has said that so all the naysayers, who said no we can’t, therefore we can’t, that is not true. The second thing is that they have refused to stop the process of passage of the constitutional amendment, they refused that injunction, they will not interfere with the legislative process so all in all it is not a bad result.”

The British Caribbean Bank attorneys say they are confident that the same message will be handed down to the GOB when the BBC challenges the 2011 Act and the Ninth Amendment in the Supreme Court.

LOVEFM

Top
#414120 - 08/18/11 02:10 PM Re: CCJ Puts Brakes On BTL Sale [Re: Marty]
Marty Offline

GOB Responds To CCJ

Last night we had a long report on the special sitting of the Caribbean Court of Justice to hear an appeal from the Ashcroft Alliance on the reacquisition of Telemedia and the proposed 9th Amendment to the Constitution. As we told you, the court granted special leave to appeal to Dean Boyce and the British Caribbean Bank and barred government from selling any shares in BTL until the matter is settled before the courts.

For clarity, that leave to appeal is against the court of appeal's refusal to make orders giving Telemedia back to the Ashcroft Alliance. That was two months ago, in June of this year. That's when Government used police to hold unto the company, insisting that the Ashcroft Alliance needed an enforcement order to re-take possession. The Alliance went to the court of appeal for those orders but it was turned away. Now the CCJ says the Alliance can appeal that.

But government issued a release today giving its official reaction. As regards the leave to appeal, government points to the fact that "such an appeal would be futile unless the Supreme Court of Belize first strikes down the 2011 re-acquisition of Telemedia and the 9th Constitution Amendment Bill.

And as regards the injunction against selling shares, government says, quote "once the 9th Amendment Bill is passed…the injunction will fall away and Government will be free to continue sale of minority Telemedia shares, including to the employees."

And as to the point made by the court that the 9th Amendment can be challenged and overturned, government says it proves its point that, quote: "no language or provision in the Bill would bar anyone from access to court."

The official release ends with some rather extravagant, overtly political flourishes, stating that yesterday's proceedings, demonstrate the, quote "the Ashcroft Alliance's implacable determination to defeat the will and sovereignty of the Belizean people" and adds that quote "the greatest weapon to safeguard…Telemedia from Ashcroft's continuing billionaire power plays, is the Ninth Amendment."

If you would like to hear the full proceedings from yesterday's teleconference session of the CCJ - in a first - it has been posted on the CCJ's website and you can find a link to that at 7newsbelize.com.

http://caribbeancourtofjustice.org/audio/al8&92011/al8&92011a.html

Channel 7


Top

Links
Click for excellent scuba lessons with Elbert Greer!


Things to do

News
Daily News
Daily Weather

Classified Ads
BelizeNews.com
San Pedro Sun
Ambergris Today
SP Town Council
Channel 7
Channel 5
Amandala
Love FM
The Reporter
Caye Caulker
Chronicles

PLUS TV
TV Newscasts
Radio Stations

Click for our
Search thousands of Belizean-only websites

Event Guides
Event Calendar
Specials & Events
Things to Do
SanPedroScoop
iTravel Belize
Paradise Theater

Blogs
San Pedro Scoop!
Tia Chocolate
Tacogirl
My Beautiful Belize
I-Travel Belize
Belize Adventure
Belize Hub
Romantic Travel
Bound for Belize
Conch Creative
As The Coconuts Drop
More Blogs...
Search thousands of Belizean-only websites
Chaa Creek is an award-winning luxury Belize Resort, rated as one of the worlds best Eco Lodges. We are a pioneer in adventure travel to Belize since 1981!
White Sands Dive Shop - 5 Star PADI Dive Facility - Daily diving, SCUBA instruction and Snorkeling
Caribbean Inspired All Natural Condiments & Spice Blends, Over 100 are Gluten Free!
We manage a variety of homes, apartments, condos and commercial properties here on Ambergris Caye. Our minimum lease on ALL properties is six months.
Conch Shell Inn: All rooms are right on the beach in the heart of San Pedro, so within walking distance to anything and everything!!
Lil’ Alphonse has snorkel equipment to fit anyone as well as Marine Park Tickets and flotation devices to assist those not as experienced.
Coastal Xpress offers a daily scheduled ferry run to most resorts, restaurants and private piers on the island of Anbergris Caye. We also offer  private and charter water taxi service.
Mini Chat

Cayo Espanto
Click for Cayo Espanto, and have your own private island
More Links
Click for exciting and adventurous tours of Belize with Katie Valk!
December
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online
1 registered (1 invisible), 44 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
18,676 Registered Members
44 Forums
64,077 Topics
462,353 Posts

Most users ever online: 1,262 @ 06/10/07 07:16 PM




AmbergrisCaye.com CayeCaulker.org HELP! Visitor Center Goods & Services San Pedro Town
BelizeSearch.com Message Board Lodging Diving Fishing Things to Do History
BelizeNews.com Maps Phonebook Belize Business Directory
BelizeCards.com SanPedroDaily.com Picture of the Day

The opinions and views expressed on this board are the subjective opinions of Ambergris Caye Message Board members
and not of the Ambergris Caye Message Board its affiliates, or its employees.