Has anyone figured out why, with all the fees collected to use it, the bridge is always under repair? Seems like a good opportunity for a good builder to replace it with something well built and charge enough to pay it off in 10 years or so and maintain it.
This one seems like a joke that costs too much and is always screwed up or needing repair.
Did some politician's relative build it? Where do the fees go?
What would it take to do it right? New politicians? Or just some common sense?
I've built more than a few bridges, would love to see this silly thing done right!