It seems that the VC has their hands tied when electing to eradicate problem dogs. There appears to be only one legal choice of poison that indemnifies the VC from liability in this process. Proponents of a more humane choice when euthanizing dogs should be aware of this law. Perhaps a unified citizen and VC proposal to modify this law could help in making a more humane poison such as the one suggested by Deb an option for the VC? I suggest that "or suitable alternative" be added to the description of poison in item 2(a).
Chapter 153 of the Belize dog act states:
POISONING OF DOGS FOUND AT LARGE
18.-(1) Subject to this section, the licensing authority of any city or town may place poison in any street or place of public resort in such city or town for the purpose of poisoning any dog which is at large therein.
(2) (a)The poison used shall be a preparation of strychnine in capsule form.
(b) The licensing authority shall obtain the poison from the Government pharmacist or from a Government officer who is a qualified chemist and druggist.
(c) The Government pharmacist or such Government officer shall keep a special register of poisons supplied under this Act. He shall enter in such register the quantity of poison in stock and the date, quantity and name of the person to whom he issues the poison. He shall issue poison only to the chief executive officer or other similar officer of a licensing authority.
(d) The chief executive officer or other similar officer of a licensing authority shall keep a register and shall enter therein the date and quantity of poison received by him and also the date, quantity and name of the person to whom he issues the poison.
(e) The chief executive officer or other similar officer of a licensing authority shall issue poison only to a public health inspector who shall sign the register for it.
(f) A public health inspector and a police officer shall accompany each team of a licensing authority which is engaged on a poisoning operation. The public health inspector shall ensure that-
(i) the poison is not scattered broadcast but thrown to individual dogs which are at large in any street or place of public resort;
(ii) the operation is conducted at such times as the streets and places of public resort are likely to be unfrequented; and
(iii) any poison which is not eaten by the dog or dogs to which it was thrown is recovered
(g) On the conclusion of the poisoning operation, the public health inspector shall return all unused or uneaten capsules of poison to the chief executive officer or other similar officer of the licensing authority who shall enter the number so returned and suitable for safe storage in his register and shall sign the entry in the presence of the public health inspector.
(h) The chief executive officer or other similar officer of a licensing authority shall, in the presence of the public health inspector, destroy by fire any capsule of poison returned to him which is unsuitable for safe storage.
(3) No licensing authority shall incur any civil liability for any dog
destroyed in accordance with this section.
(4) For the purposes of this section, "street" includes any highway, and any road, bridge, lane, mews, footway, square, court, alley, passage,
whether a thoroughfare or not and any part of any such highway, road, bridge, lane, mews, footway, square, court, alley or passage.
With these laws specified; the Village Council does have the right to do what they have done. Because these laws are not enforced not every one is aware that Dog Laws do exist in Belize and they can be held accountable if they are broken. These NEED to be enforced on Caye Caulker, not only for the benefit of the Village Council but mainly for every single person living on this island. The most affected are the children who are constantly playing on the streets or any public place on or around dog feces which is the most contaminated 'product'.