Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#516741 - 08/10/16 12:20 PM Caleb Orozco wins his case!  
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 55,704
Marty Online happy
Marty  Online Happy


A celebratory hug moments after the Chief Justice decides in favor of Caleb Orosco

Supreme Court rules Section 53 unconstitutional
Chief Justice Kenneth Benjamin today found that Section 53 of the Criminal Code which criminalizes consenting intercourse between adults of the same sex contravenes the right granted by the Constitution of Belize to no interference with a person’s dignity and personal privacy, as well as equality and equal treatment of all persons before the law. So finding, he added that the court has an obligation to amend the law to bring it in conformity with the Constitution, and ordered an amendment specifying that the section does not apply to consenting sexual acts between adults of the same gender. […]

Claimants pleased, Evangelicals gnash teeth following Section 53 decision
A small contingent of pro-LGBT individuals countered the much larger – though not by much – Christian gathering as the two bracketed Regent Street, and cheered the good news delivered around 11:30. Meanwhile, disappointed Evangelical Christian leaders attending the decision say they will redouble their efforts despite a court-sanctioned dismissal. […]

Belize’s Supreme Court Just Struck Down A Law That Made Homosexuality Illegal
The country is the first former British colony in the Caribbean to strike down its colonial-era sodomy law, and it could boost LGBT rights throughout the region. The Belize Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a law punishing homosexuality was unconstitutional. The decision was announced on the LGBT rights group Unibam’s Twitter account soon after the ruling was made. Unibam which first brought the challenge against the law back in 2010. Caleb Orozco, the main plaintiff in the case, told BuzzFeed News in an email that the Supreme Court ruled in his favor on privacy grounds, as well as under protections of “dignity, equality, and freedom of expression.” He added that the court also decided that protections in the Belizean constitution surrounding sex extend to sexual orientation.


#516744 - 08/10/16 03:23 PM Re: Caleb Orozco wins his case! [Re: Marty]  
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 52
Conch Creative Offline
.
Conch Creative  Offline
Couldn't be more pleased. This has changed the lives of thousands of Belizean people and will set the precedent for the rest of the Caribbean. Caleb is an incredibly brave young man. As a tourist destination, Belize will benefit greatly by legally being gay friendly. Love it!

#516747 - 08/10/16 10:35 PM Re: Caleb Orozco wins his case! [Re: Marty]  
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,441
ScubaLdy Offline
.
ScubaLdy  Offline
At last! Yes, there are many LBGT with money to travel and we can now welcome them OPENLY.


Harriette
Take only pictures leave only bubbles
#516826 - 08/13/16 06:18 AM Re: Caleb Orozco wins his case! [Re: Marty]  
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 55,704
Marty Online happy
Marty  Online Happy

#516849 - 08/15/16 05:05 AM Re: Caleb Orozco wins his case! [Re: Marty]  
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 55,704
Marty Online happy
Marty  Online Happy

Section 53 ruling – What does it truly mean?

By Colette Kase

If you have been reading or watching the news or social media, you will have heard that there was a case ruled in the Belize Supreme Court on the 10th of August 2016. You probably know it is something to do with ‘gays’ and you may or may not have an opinion on that. In fact, you probably are not even sure what the case was about. Please allow me to assist.

Several years ago I met a young man called Caleb. He was shy, geeky and always just a little bit nervous. He grew up with little or nothing, just like so many other young men, in the south side of Belize City. He also happened to be a gay man. This is where his life differed greatly from many of his peers. You see, Belize was, until the 10th of August, one of 76 countries that criminalise homosexuality in one way or another.


Surprisingly to many, Belize’s law was not gender specific, nor did it mention homosexuality. Section 53 of the Criminal Code simply referred to ‘intercourse against the order of nature with any other person’ and came with the generous prison sentence of 10 years. Technically, this meant that any sex act not performed exclusively for the purpose of procreation was outlawed, whether you were gay or straight. The problem was that this law had been used exclusively to stigmatise and discriminate against LGBT people and this is what the Chief Justice Kenneth Benjamin found in his ruling.

Three years ago I sat in the Supreme Court and watched Caleb Orozco metamorphasise from the socially awkward, quiet young man I knew into a freedom fighter. He, as an individual, took the government of Belize to the Supreme Court and made it very clear that as a Belizean, he had the right to the same protections under the Constitution of Belize as any other citizen and the fact that he was gay shouldn’t change that.

It took three years for the ruling to finally be read. During that time, Caleb became known worldwide as a human rights campaigner and the New York Times featured him on the front cover of their magazine. Caleb’s case was artfully handled by some of the best legal minds.

For the reading, two highly respected lawyers, Lisa Shoman, who has served as Senator, Foreign Minister and Ambassador for Belize, and Westmin James, a litigation specialist in human rights and social justice from the University of the West Indies, who both represented Caleb through this challenge, were present to hear what is a historic ruling in the Caribbean for LGBT people.

The Chief Justice decided that Caleb Orozco had, indeed, been discriminated against and found in his favour making it clear that consensual sex between gay adults is not a crime…oh, and where the constitution of Belize talks about protecting all people from discrimination, sexual orientation is covered.

But what does it really mean? I’m so glad you asked because there are a lot of myths and misconceptions about this ruling and I’d like to sort that out for you right now.

  • LGBT Belizeans in consensual relationships will no longer be at risk of arrest or extortion by those using this law to criminalise their sexuality and relationships.
  • LGBT Belizeans will be able to access health care and other services without fear of stigmatisation.
  • LGBT Belizeans are now guaranteed, along with all other Belizeans, to be protected from discrimination according to the Constitution of Belize.
  • People who have LGBT family members, children, friends and loved ones, no longer have to be so frightened and worried on their behalf.
  • LGBT people across the Caribbean may now have a better chance to gain equality in their own countries.
  • Straight people can have fun in the bedroom even if they aren’t trying to make babies and not be ‘unapprehended felons’.
  • Any non-consensual sex, including sex with minors and animals, continues to be an offence.
  • There will be no orgies in the street.
  • LGBT tourists are welcome to come and spend lots and lots of money here knowing that they are supporting a country that protects the rights of all of its citizens.

That’s about it. There has been some wailing about the end of the world by a small, vocal minority. It appears that they find the idea of two men having sex disgusting. I can understand that. The thought of quite a few people I encounter day to day having sex would also disgust me. Please allow me to resolve that problem. Stop thinking about other people having sex. Once you do that, you’ll discover that unless you are gay, this ruling really hasn’t changed anything.

For Caleb, everything has changed. He’s a bit of a hero now and for the first time in his adult life, he is no longer considered a criminal for being who he is. Oh, and I can proudly call a real life hero my friend. Love wins.

San Pedro Sun


#516877 - 08/16/16 05:21 AM Re: Caleb Orozco wins his case! [Re: Marty]  
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,391
Katie Valk Offline
Katie Valk  Offline
Aye, another idiot who aspires to be pm.


Belize based travel specialist
www.belize-trips.com
info@belize-trips.com
#517067 - 08/24/16 05:02 AM Re: Caleb Orozco wins his case! [Re: Marty]  
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 55,704
Marty Online happy
Marty  Online Happy

The genesis of the Section 53 challenge: Part 1

Caleb Orozco’s constitutional challenge against Section 53 of Belize’s Criminal Code represents a landmark ruling for Belize—but it is also an example of “strategic litigation,” designed to achieve broader aims across the wider Caribbean.

According to Tracy Robinson, a Jamaican attorney, almost a decade ago, she worked with a doctoral degree student to conduct a desk review to find “whether there was a reasonable case to be made before a constitutional court regarding the laws criminalizing ‘same sex’ sex.”

Robinson, who once chaired the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, an organ of the Organization of American States, said that Belize was chosen because it was the optimal country to bring the case.

“No other country has the constellation of factors, in law, which come together to make Belize the ideal location…” she said, in a video conference briefing held in July 2016, leading up to the ruling by Belize Justice Kenneth Benjamin on August 10.

Robinson is the co-founder of the University of the West Indies – Rights Advocacy Project (U-RAP), which has launched challenges to laws in Belize and Guyana through LGBT nationals in those countries.

Robinson reviewed the timeline of the Orozco case, dating back to the desk review of 2007.

She said that in 2008, UWI teachers, an LGBT rep and a Belizean lawyer participated in a regional assessment, which looked at the desk review.

“There was a strong sense from that report that Belize was most favorable environment on paper to litigate,” Robinson said.

Then in 2009, U-RAP, the agency which supported the challenge to Belize’s Section 53 and which is supporting the challenge to Guyana’s cross-dressing laws, was formalized by an academic board at Cave Hill, Barbados. The group wanted to look at constitutional litigation in the English- speaking Caribbean, in challenging laws which they contend undermine the human dignity and human rights of sexual minorities.

According to Robinson, between 2007 and 2009, there was a series of 4 meetings and there were discussions with LGBT civil society about the possibility of litigation.

Some of those discussions, she said, included Caleb Orozco, and within the context of those discussions there were discussions with Orozco about the possibility of a case in Belize.

According to Robinson, in 2010, a human rights lawyer conducted an independent assessment of the socio-political environment in Belize. U-RAP led three visits to Belize and meetings ensued with parties such as the larger LGBT community, lawyers, academics, persons involved in HIV work, “some people close to the Government,” and other human rights groups, she detailed.

Following these Belize visits, in July 2010, the Orozco case was launched in the Belize Supreme Court.

Robinson explained that she was providing a matrix of how U-RAP made an assessment of whether litigation in Belize made sense. They considered whether the Belize Government would undo “positive litigation and positive outcomes by instituting constitutional reforms…”

“You don’t want to litigate somewhere where they are going to use constitutional reforms to undo [the efforts]… so you want there to be strong support for litigation,” Robinson explained.

They also considered the position and attitude of the church, she said.

In detailing the history of the case, she noted that the Commonwealth Lawyers Association, The Human Dignity Trust, and The International Commission of Jurists first joined as interested parties in support of Orozco, which, she said, led to anxiety that the case was not being led by Caribbean parties but by outsiders. Subsequently, the three sets of churches—the Anglicans, Catholics and Evangelicals—also joined. Supreme Court Justice Michelle Arana knocked out UNIBAM as a claimant and so the organization was added as the 7th interested party in the case.

In the 2012 U-RAP report, “Collateral Damage: The Social Impact of Laws Affecting LGBT Persons in Guyana,” by Christopher Carrico, it is stated that, “Homosexual acts are now legal in 113 countries in the world, but there are some 80 countries where they are still illegal. Eleven (11) of these are former British colonies in the West Indies: Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago…”

The New York Times article, “The Lonely Fight Against Belize’s Antigay Laws,” said that, “The legal groups [in the Belize case] invoked the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in their argument, with the knowledge that should the appeals court rule in Orozco’s favor on that basis, other jurisdictions would find the criminalization of sodomy very hard to justify.”

The question now is, whether the case will eventually make its way to the nation’s highest appellate court—the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), which hopes to expand its appellate jurisdiction across the Caribbean.

Robinson said, “…there is going to be an appeal almost certainly.” She is of the view that the interested parties may have a right to appeal the case as well, based on new developments in Caribbean constitutional law. An appeal would first have to go to the Court of Appeal before the CCJ.

BROWSE The OROZCO RULING


The genesis of the Section 53 challenge: Part 2

Buggery or anal intercourse between males is only aone of severl sexual acts which are deemed a violation of the sacred books of the three dominant world religions—Christianity, Islam and Judaism. For example, the Torah or the Books of Moses contain commandments against bestiality, incest and rape, and the Laws of Belize criminalize these acts as well. The violations spelt out in the aforementioned sacred books are called “ecclesiastical crimes;” and they made their way onto civil law books in many countries across the world—not just in Belize.

Leviticus 20:13 says: ‘And a man who lies with a male as he lies with a woman: both of them have done an abomination, they shall certainly be put to death, their blood is upon them.” (The Scriptures, 1998 version)

Notably, even European jurisdictions once meted out sentences of death by burning upon homosexuals; but today, those countries have legalized and even liberalized homosexuality.

In Greek and Roman mythology, even certain gods were deemed to have homosexual desires and relationships, primary among them being Zeus or Jupiter, who, despite being portrayed as a womanizer, was also said to be enamored with a young mortal man, Ganymede, whom he supposedly turned into an eagle and abducted to serve as his cupbearer.

Likewise, same-sex relations have existed in ancient cultures, and Nero (37 to 68 AD), infamous for his persecution of Christians, whose “ecclesiastical law” he had rejected, was said to have been the first Roman Emperor to engage in same-sex marriage, twice. He is said to have acted as husband to a young boy, Sporus (whom the emperor allegedly had castrated), and as bride to Phytagoras (for whom he cross-dressed at a public wedding ceremony). This is a glimpse of the ancient backdrop against which there is a new global lobby for state-recognized same-sex marriages.

Although same-sex marriages are not legally sanctioned in Belize—at least not yet—the criminalization of homosexuality has recently been overturned.

Up until August 10, 2016—when Belize’s Chief Justice Kenneth Benjamin ruled that Section 53 of Belize’s Criminal Code which criminalizes all “unnatural” sex acts is unconstitutional—Belize was one of the remaining 80 or so countries where homosexuality was deemed illegal, although Belize had not been in the practice of enforcing the law against homosexuals, except in the case of rape or anal penetration of minors.

“These crimes all started as ecclesiastical crimes, which moved to the civil domain,” said Tracy Robinson, the co-founder of the University of the West Indies – Rights Advocacy Project (U-RAP), which had launched challenges to laws in Belize against sodomy and in Guyana against cross-dressing, through LGBT claimants in those countries.

Robinson was speaking at a recent video conference briefing in July, explaining the background to the challenge brought by Caleb Orozco, a Belizean homosexual, to Belize’s sodomy law in July 2010.

Homosexuality is notably criminalized in several Caribbean jurisdictions, and Robinson said that she had led a desk review back in 2007, which revealed that Belize was the best place in the Caribbean to bring such a legal challenge.

Orozco told the media in June 2016, according to an interview published online by Love News, that, “Some work has been done behind the scenes and that started prior to filing the legal documents in Santo Domingo, where we talked about finding the two best countries in the Caribbean to file this court case—which were Guyana and Belize.

“What happened is that Belize ended up getting the challenge to its sodomy law while Guyana ended up with a case around cross dressing.”

According to U-RAP, the Guyana case is expected to go to full hearing in that country’s appeals court in October 2016.

The four applicants—Quincy McEwan, Seon Clarke, Joseph Fraser and Seyon Persaud—were arrested, convicted and fined in February 2009 under section 153 (1) (xlvii) for “being a man, and in any public way or public place, for any improper purpose, appearing in female attire,” U-RAP detailed. The law is found under a section which deals with ‘Offences Against Religion, Morality and Public Convenience’.

The Guyana claimants are also working along with the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD) and Guyana Trans United (GTU).

The Guyana law is another instance where the civil law reflects ecclesiastical law. Deuteronomy 22:5 says: “A woman does not wear that which pertains to a man, nor does a man put on a woman’s garment, for whoever does this is an abomination to YHUH your Elohim.” (The Scriptures, 1998 version)

Robinson noted that whereas older Caribbean laws did not specifically speak against lesbian relations, laws began to emerge in the 80s indicating that same-sex acts between women are explicitly criminalized. She said that the Belize case, which challenges a clause which covers “unnatural sex” regardless of gender, also has important implications for women.

In reviewing the possible outcomes of the Belize case ahead of the Chief Justice’s ruling, she noted that since the Orozco case was heard in May 2013, India’s appellate court had in November 2013 overturned its earlier ruling of 2009, on which the parties supporting Orozco “widely relied.”

In a ruling similar to Benjamin’s ruling, the Delhi High Court had held in a challenge brought by the Naz Foundation, that treating consensual homosexual sex between adults as a crime is a violation of fundamental rights protected by India’s Constitution.

However, the ruling was later challenged in the Supreme Court of India, which ruled in November 2013, after the Orozco hearing was concluded, that homosexuality or unnatural sex even between two consenting adults (under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code) would continue to be an offence, as the provision is not unconstitutional.

She noted that Benjamin’s decision to deliver his decision was timed immediately after the Caribbean Court of Justice issued its ruling on the challenge filed by LGBT activist and attorney, Maurice Tomlinson of Jamaica, to the Immigration laws of Belize, and Trinidad and Tobago, dismissing his case.

Both the CCJ ruling and the Naz Foundation ruling, reversing the lower court’s decision legalizing homosexuality, might have had an impact on what the Chief Justice said, Robinson surmised.

Evidently, those decisions by the CCJ and Indian court did not sway Benjamin from finding in Orozco’s favor. Robinson expects an appeal.

Orozco claimed violations of his human rights to dignity and privacy, but Robinson explained that, “The Constitution of Belize specifically talks about public morality as a legitimate reason for limiting fundamental rights…”

She expressed the view that the interested parties in the Orozco case, which include the churches, may have a right to appeal as well, based on new developments in Caribbean Constitutional law.

Robinson said that this is only a Supreme Court decision, and the precedential value of the case for other Caribbean countries with buggery laws would increase if the matter is appealed and finally ventilated at the CCJ, the regional court to whose jurisdiction she said a growing number of countries are acceding.

She said that, “Even if [the Orozco ruling] has limited precedential value, it could also provide an impetus for law reform, for international action, for changing the mood and the spirit of conversations, about the human rights of LGBT persons…”

In related news, Maurice Tomlinson also filed a lawsuit challenging Jamaica’s buggery legislation last December, but the trial is pending.

Tomlinson told The Gleaner newspaper, according to an online article dated August 11, 2016, that, “I am more hopeful now, because all of the rights which the judge in Belize ruled were violated under their Constitution, are the same rights which I am alleging are violated under our Constitution, by our anti-sodomy law.”

In a statement released on Monday, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, of which Robinson formerly served as chair, hailed the decision by the Barrow administration not to appeal Benjamin’s ruling.

The Commission said that in its report titled, “Violence against LGBTI people in America,” it had “highlighted the inconsistency of laws that criminalize consensual sex between same-sex persons with the principles of equality and non-discrimination.”

The Commission, which is an agency of the Organization of American States (OAS), is calling on the Caribbean to put in place a moratorium on enforcing laws against same-sex relations.

The Commission said that it is asking “…other States in the region that have existing laws that criminalize consensual sex between adults of the same-sex, to repeal these laws, and, meanwhile, to impose an explicit and formal moratorium on their application.”

Meanwhile, the most visible groups in Belize’s Christian community, which was said to account for 71% of Belize’s population in the 2010 census, are collectively adamant that laws against homosexuality should remain on the law books, and they rallied roughly 1,000 for a prayer patrol at the seat of Government in Belmopan on Tuesday to make their position known.

They are also discussing a proposal for the churches to seek an appeal of Benjamin’s decision, for which they have a 21-day window period from the release of his decision.

Amandala


#517174 - 08/29/16 12:20 PM Re: Caleb Orozco wins his case! [Re: Marty]  
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 55,704
Marty Online happy
Marty  Online Happy

UWI Belize Constitutional Case Briefing

Tracy Robinson, an LGBT advocate, shares the background story of HOW and WHY Belize was selected for the sodomy lawsuit challenge, characteristics of a "favourable environment" for the first lawsuit of many in the Caribbean. Quite revealing...



Links
Portofino Resort- Now with a new BEACH BAR!!

Click for excellent scuba lessons with Elbert Greer!


Things to do

News
Daily News
Daily Weather

Classified Ads
BelizeNews.com
San Pedro Sun
Ambergris Today
SP Town Council
Channel 7
Channel 5
Amandala
Love FM
The Reporter
PLUS TV
TV Newscasts
Radio Stations

Click for our
Search thousands of Belizean-only websites

Event Guides
Event Calendar
Specials & Events
Things to Do
SanPedroScoop
iTravel Belize
Paradise Theater
Paradise Guy Event Calendar

Blogs
San Pedro Scoop!
Tia Chocolate
Tacogirl
My Beautiful Belize
I-Travel Belize
Belize Adventure
Belize Hub
Romantic Travel
Bound for Belize
Conch Creative
As The Coconuts Drop
More Blogs...
Search thousands of Belizean-only websites
Chaa Creek is an award-winning luxury Belize Resort, rated as one of the worlds best Eco Lodges. We are a pioneer in adventure travel to Belize since 1981!
White Sands Dive Shop - 5 Star PADI Dive Facility - Daily diving, SCUBA instruction and Snorkeling
Caribbean Inspired All Natural Condiments & Spice Blends, Over 100 are Gluten Free!
We manage a variety of homes, apartments, condos and commercial properties here on Ambergris Caye. Our minimum lease on ALL properties is six months.
Conch Shell Inn: All rooms are right on the beach in the heart of San Pedro, so within walking distance to anything and everything!!
Lil Alphonse has snorkel equipment to fit anyone as well as Marine Park Tickets and flotation devices to assist those not as experienced.
Coastal Xpress offers a daily scheduled ferry run to most resorts, restaurants and private piers on the island of Anbergris Caye. We also offer  private and charter water taxi service.
November
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
Cayo Espanto
Click for Cayo Espanto, and have your own private island
More Links
Click for exciting and adventurous tours of Belize with Katie Valk!
Mini Chat
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Marty), 235 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums44
Topics65,665
Posts466,543
Members18,960
Most Online1,262
Jun 10th, 2007



AmbergrisCaye.com CayeCaulker.org HELP! Visitor Center Goods & Services San Pedro Town
BelizeSearch.com Message Board Lodging Diving Fishing Things to Do History
BelizeNews.com Maps Phonebook Belize Business Directory
BelizeCards.com Picture of the Day

The opinions and views expressed on this board are the subjective opinions of Ambergris Caye Message Board members
and not of the Ambergris Caye Message Board its affiliates, or its employees.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0