I am sad to learn of this loss. A close friend of mine was murdered two weeks ago and I know the deep grief this brings. I understand too the anger, fear and frustration that comes with a situation like this. My prayers are with this family and the small community of San Pedro.
I am pleased to see calls for working together to come up with creative ways of deterring future acts like this, as well as other types of criminal activity. I especially appreciate bywarren's comments which note that family and community attitudes go a long way toward determining what will be acceptable in the community. I'm also not surprised to see many calls for execution. The desire for vengeance has long been nurtured in our societies and generally promises a satisfaction and relief it can never bring. I'm not against punishment - it serves a variety of purposes, the most important of which should be to protect society from future harm. That said, there is little debate that capital punishment does not serve as a deterrent to future homicides.
Studies which compare homicide trends in states and countries that practice capital punishment with those that do not consistently show that capital punishment has no effect on homicide rates. The first of the comparative studies of capital punishment was done by Thorsten Sellin in 1959. He was a sociologist at the University of Pennsylvania, one of the pioneers of scientific criminology and instrumental in setting up the government agencies that collect statistics on crime. Every comparison he made led him to the "inevitable conclusion . . . that executions have no discernable effect on homicide rates." His work has been replicated repeatedly as new data have become available, and all of the replications have confirmed his finding that capital punishment does not deter homicide.
There have also been national and international comparative studies on the impact of abolishing the death penalty. In an examination of 14 countries that abolished the death penalty, it was found that abolition did not cause an increase in homicide rates. The research in both these areas has been convincing to most criminologists.
On the other hand, there have been some studies that use econometric modeling, also known as multiple regression modeling, some of which have found a deterrent effect in the death penalty and some which have not. In general these studies have been found to lack sufficient empirical data to be of much value. This method has consistently failed to offer reliable and valid results in studies of social problems where the data are very limited. Its most successful use is in making predictions in areas where there is a large flow of data for testing. The econometric literature on capital punishment has been carefully reviewed by several prominent economists and found wanting. There is simply too little data and too many ways to manipulate it. The Death Penalty Information Center provides fairly balanced information on this topic. (
www.deathpenaltyinfo.org)
I'm an attorney - 7 years as a criminal prosecutor - started law school as a strong proponent of the death penalty and went to work feeling the same way. Education is an interesting thing - almost 10 years later I resigned my job as a prosecutor because I was unwilling to prosecute a capital case. There are lots of reasons (moral, ethical, religious, fiscal, legal, due process considerations) to be against the death penalty, and really only one reason to be in favor of, but former posters are correct - everyone is entitled to their own view. And it is also unlikely an argument on this board is going to change anyone's mind either way.
I pray the citizens of San Pedro are able to come together to find workable solutions to the problems they face which are common to us all.