Sorry Bobber,
You say "I am perfectly satisfied with it" and "Pics are loaded. I will apologize for the quality of the underwaters, I was trying a faster film that didn't pan out."
So what is it, you are 'perfectly satisfied' or apologizing for the quality? Faster film to try to improve the inadequacy of the camera is proof you don't know what you're talking about.
Again, "Hi Nancyo. I used a Sealife Reefmaster with strobe. About a $400 dollar outfit. I am disapointed with these pics, previous ones were much better. I used a faster film this time and the results weren't as good as I've had with slower film"
Rolling my eyes...
"Take a look at the pics. The faster film needed more light, which the flash and ambient couldn't supply unless I was really close. The current pics are pretty faded."
Now I'm laughing my a$$ off, faster film requires less light, 400iso/asa is 2f-stops different than 100 iso/asa or the shutter speed difference of 250 and 1000 per sec. Does EV mean anything to you? (exposure value)
You also say "as I have a problem remembering what I did between when I did it and the film comes back"
Sounds like to many beers to me, do you suffer from blackouts as well?
And, "When you use something once or twice a year, it tends to get dicey."
Don't give photo advice, Nuff said...
Zagnut,
Here's some of my stuff.
http://community.webshots.com/user/idaho_diver Sorry to sound anal, but some shouldn't give advice when they don't know what they are talking about...