Part of the problem Dan, may be that you admit to "literary embellishments" or editorial license for the sake of the reader, or mis-represent certain details - such as WHICH guard supposedly noticed suspicious activity - I see two distinct references to two different individuals. Once you do that,you forgo credibility in reportage and fall into the semi-fiction area, foregoing credibility of fact.

I'm certainly not calling you out to be a prevaricator ( and love the writing style), just making an observation as to why you may be getting SOME of the responses you are.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _________________ _ _ _ _ _ _
But then what do I know, I am but a mere caveman